| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,822 Views) | |
| North Korea | 6 Jan 2015, 00:13 Post #2181 |
|
I believe that Lauren was the original killer so it was changed due to her pregnancy. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordFanatic | 6 Jan 2015, 00:14 Post #2182 |
|
How can you back this up though, what is the basis for this, apart from it being your personal opinion? |
![]() Thanks Nick | |
![]() |
|
| Shamelessness | 6 Jan 2015, 00:15 Post #2183 |
![]()
|
Then you need to present it as such and not as a fact. |
| |
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 6 Jan 2015, 00:15 Post #2184 |
|
I thought it was changed because somebody put big successive bets on Jane to be the killer in paddy power? |
![]() |
|
| Katie | 6 Jan 2015, 00:17 Post #2185 |
|
The interview where he mentioned the killer being changed might have been released in September, but I'm sure he said the killer was changed before any of the scripts were written and filmed. I'm wondering if Pam meeting Paul was added to make her look suspicious due to the bets placed on her though. |
![]() |
|
| North Korea | 6 Jan 2015, 00:20 Post #2186 |
|
My personal opinon of course, back on 15 August 2014, Jacqueline Jossa' special announcement via twitter. A few weeks later - new killer. |
![]() |
|
| North Korea | 6 Jan 2015, 00:22 Post #2187 |
|
Was placed in late November. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordFanatic | 6 Jan 2015, 00:23 Post #2188 |
|
I guess we'll find out after Lucy's killer is revealed in 43 days. |
![]() Thanks Nick | |
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 6 Jan 2015, 00:31 Post #2189 |
|
Intrigue!!! Okay so the top ish suspects are all female, coincidence? Previous reveals were Stacey, Lisa, etc... I am not sure if I'm reading too much into it but are the Jane Abi Denise as killers too obvious? Would it be shocking or upsetting? Are they red herrings? And in the trailer picture Abi has a red coat on! It is almost like they are pushing us to believe it is one of those 3 which to me suggests it is not! And I am also not convinced that Emma did know who it was, she probably thought she knew or as some others have suggested: was talking to the wrong person perhaps someone protecting? |
![]() |
|
| *Betty* | 6 Jan 2015, 00:35 Post #2190 |
![]() ![]()
|
DTC said in his interviewthat he has had the Lucy murder story in his mind ofr years but when he suggested it to his current team they changed the killer in the discussion room stages because they wanted it to be more real and emotional. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 6 Jan 2015, 00:36 Post #2191 |
|
North Korea, you're being very confusing. (The irony) In the same post where you say that the killer was changed mid September, you also state that there had been no change to the killer once the story was written and began playing out on screen. Which is it? For the record, the 2nd statement is correct. Dom clarified that in the initial planning stages of the story, there was a different killer in mind but they scrapped that idea as it wasn't 'truthful'. Once the scripts were written and the story began playing out on screen, the killer has remained the same. Edited by Bec, 6 Jan 2015, 01:13.
|
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 6 Jan 2015, 00:39 Post #2192 |
|
And in the same trailer people like Danny Pennant to name only 1 suspect are missing from the scene, does it mean it is only people in that group? Or that we can expect someone outside of that group? And there is an odd scene at the start of that trailer but very dark though, just before the finger pointing starts at Denise max Peter etc |
![]() |
|
| *Betty* | 6 Jan 2015, 00:46 Post #2193 |
![]() ![]()
|
So yes the point being the killer never changed because of Jossa's maternity. Right lets take the Missing/Emma similarities. What if Ian knocked Lucy down on his way home from being with Rainie. Ian got out of the car, and looked but due to his bad eye sight he mistook her for a dog, got back in the car and drove off. Ben and Jay oversaw this, they rushed over but Lucy came round and confronted Ben and Jay, the mugged her of her phone to stop her calling the police (and also her purse) and ran off. Lucy got up and staggered off to the flats where she was confronted by Abi. Abi and Lucy's confrontation continued as they walked through the common. Abi shoved Lucy and she collapsed, freaking out Abi dragged Lucy into the woods and disappeared. Ultimately Ian killed Lucy, but Abi believes she did. Max now knows about Abi's invovlement and also believes his incident with Lucy had an effect on her head wound, hence Abi helping clean the portakabin. Ben has now told Jane and Phil about Ian, and they are protecting him. Jane is marrying Ian as she feels sorry for him rather than true love. Its complicated and messy but it works... |
| |
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 6 Jan 2015, 00:46 Post #2194 |
|
Sorry I think I started the confusion! Had a quick look for a link: http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/6021642?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067 hope this helps! |
![]() |
|
| North Korea | 6 Jan 2015, 00:52 Post #2195 |
|
It was Dominic' words that the killer wasn't changed in the end but I don't buy it. We'll see. |
![]() |
|
| King Billy | 6 Jan 2015, 00:58 Post #2196 |
|
Mistakes her for a dog
|
![]() |
|
| ian | 6 Jan 2015, 01:00 Post #2197 |
|
The flashback episode will be on the 19th if the killer is being revealed in it. But it would be very impractical for that episode to be wholely live (Jac Jossa, location filming, etc.) I imagine the killer will be revealed in a live segment on the 19th, and then the episode after that will be live for the full 30 minutes, which would allow for the immediate aftermath that DTC promised us. I could be wrong. Edited by ian, 6 Jan 2015, 01:03.
|
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 6 Jan 2015, 01:04 Post #2198 |
|
In my opinion there are 5 to 10 plausible outcomes that will be accepted based on what has happened and I actually think that maybe the killer was changed but even so... Would it matter? Considering the actors don't know? And each loose end once tied up will appease out minds I hope?! I think a single or multi culprit outcome is possible, I think some misplaced guilt is possible, I think an outside bet like Alfie is possible or a very obvious in your face all along bet like Billy or Peter... The truth is not on the table yet in my opinion, and anything could still happen! I'm hoping its Lee or Whitney or Billy!!! |
![]() |
|
| luisgarcia | 6 Jan 2015, 01:36 Post #2199 |
![]()
|
... and then just drives off. ![]() My flabber is officially gasted. |
![]() |
|
| *Betty* | 6 Jan 2015, 01:57 Post #2200 |
![]() ![]()
|
Well the eye stuff has to link in somewhere... |
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |












7:44 PM Jul 11