Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about.

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories
Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,814 Views)
See You Slater
Member Avatar

Mrs Peel
12 Jan 2015, 17:37
See You Slater
12 Jan 2015, 17:33

Quoting limited to 2 levels deep
He could have sent Jane. As much as I would love to see that sanctimonious wotsit exposed as the killer, it's obvious she's covering for someone.
If he did send Jane, that would explain there snotty sex on the Beales carpet. Ian has been known to turn to sex in a time of stress.

I do think Jane was somehow involved, and I wouldn't be surprised if she had been brought back last January with the sole purpose of killing Lucy.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Professor Plum
Default Avatar

I have just seen where Jane covers for Lauren.
I think that is what it is, Jane covering for the daughter of her friend.

Jane knows who did it, its not Lauren, and that is why she was so quick to cover.
Just livin' in perfect New Zealand!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
See You Slater
Member Avatar

Professor Plum
12 Jan 2015, 19:29
I have just seen where Jane covers for Lauren.
I think that is what it is, Jane covering for the daughter of her friend.

Jane knows who did it, its not Lauren, and that is why she was so quick to cover.
I definitely think Jane knows who did it, and as she is willing to cover for them I think that Les/Pam/Lee/Jay can all be ruled out straight away.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fehnder
Member Avatar

I don't see why Jane would cover for Cindy. Cindy isn't anything to Jane at all. They've barely spent any time together, she'd just hand her in surely
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kim
Default Avatar

I think there's some involvement between Jane and Masood. If Cindy knew what it was, she'd probably use it to blackmail Jane into keeping quiet.

Not sure how it all fits together, but I'm sticking with Cindy now. When it was revealed that Jane and Ian would remarry on 19th February, I was sure it would be either Ian, Peter, Jane or Cindy. Cindy is probably the most dispensible in terms of the future of the Beales, having little history with Ian, but is connected enough to have an impact. Jane would also end up with the baby she's always wanted.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Josh
Default Avatar

I think Jane could be covering for any of the suspects. Perhaps not for the suspects themselves, but to protect her family. She may not want Bobby, or Ian or Peter for that matter, know that someone they know killed Lucy.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sherlockwanabe
Default Avatar

Blondie08
7 Jan 2015, 01:00
Blondie08
7 Jan 2015, 00:34
Hope this works and people can see something as we can ^o)

Posted Image
Images posted are of the Waldorf common cctv video on Lucy's case file bbc.

I'm on a smart phone so can zoom in but above the Walford there's colour in this image, when you can zoom in close it looks like someone's head, also at the beginning and end of the garbled words at the bottom and what looks like a sign or something that runs under the cctv lettering!

There's also a car light in the other image which appears during the flash in the footage. 3rd image I posted.

I see a bit more as well but keen to know if me and my friends are completely crazy or if others see these things? They may not be a clue but it definitely odd and worth a look!
Blondie08 what is it you see???? In the video? i kept rewinding and ut wont let me stop at eight pint inly does 10 second interval jumps so anniying grerrrrr!!!! I was looking through case file on bbc as well and this video is cut midway there is 1.5 min missing is that what you are referring to?! And the light flashes from left like car approaching and mini flash on middle jumps from 54 to 55:30 immediately split second lights ie someone drove there@ almost midnight... Which means: the cars parked are red herrings? Unless more than 1 culprit... Also means that body was dumped @ that time so could have been killed anytime between then and 822pm but went with jake back to square so confused!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jamie Fowler
Member Avatar

Last night I had a dream it was Alfie for some reason....
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sherlockwanabe
Default Avatar

Hi Mitchells42 it could be... What was your rationale? I had an odd thought but waning now somewhat around the fact he may be desperate for money and may have turned to selling drugs or tried to mug her then realised who it was and then perhaps pushed and killed her accidentally not sure seems far fetched now I have written it! Can you add any weight to it? Thanks
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eefan
Default Avatar

Mitchells 42
14 Jan 2015, 08:34
Last night I had a dream it was Alfie for some reason....
I also dreamt about the culprit. Only mine was Danny Pink from Doctor Who!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bec
Member Avatar

I had a dream where the culprit was Lee, I saw how it happened and how he moved the body and everything. But halfway through, Lee suddenly turned into Max and Max was the killer.

So, even in dreams, I can't call it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gabby53
Default Avatar

When Emma looked at her phone again in the pub before she raced outside, she realised that the person, Jane I think that gave Lauren her alibi of saying she didn't go inside Lucy's house, couldn't have seen that.
I think that is what Emma saw, that the view wasn't available from where the two said they were.
So Jane is covering for Lauren, but why? Lauren did look surprised when Jane said that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dan
Member Avatar


Jane is covering for Lauren in a roundabout way but she is doing so out of a sense of self preservation, I think.

If the police then interview Lauren and want to know why she was there and whether she went inside or not, Lauren will volunteer Jane as an alibi and that would eliminate Jane from suspicion as well.

Masood has not confirmed that Jane was in all night and her car wasn't there when Lauren left the party although Ian's was. I would imagine that this was when the party was winding down (as they had all left the house and Jay had returned to the Square) so I would guess that Lucy was already dead at this point and perhaps being moved hence Jane's car was not there.

It seems clear that Lauren didn't go into the house as Ian or Denise would have heard her ring the bell. I think Lauren is telling the truth, she wanted to drink and wanted to find Lucy to help her not do so.

Posted Image

Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon...

Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
soetmo
Member Avatar

There's really no way it's Lauren - is there.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
King Billy
Default Avatar

I'm still none the wiser as to what Max and Emmas last conversation was about.

"It's not there!"
"What isn't?"
(snarls) "You know!"

I could see it being Jane's car, but if Max is trying to act innocent like Emma obviously thinks he is, why would he be covering up for Jane?

The only people Max would cover for are his daughters, surely?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jamie Fowler
Member Avatar

I both hate and love that I have no idea about this whatsoever
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ross
Member Avatar
I'm in the kitchen eating a biscuit
One thing that is bugging me is: why on earth would Lauren go to Lucy for help with stopping herself from having a drink?

Lauren has a bloody short memory if this is the case. Can she not remember how Lucy spiked her orange juice with vodka in order to try and snatch Chewbacca Branning from her about a year or two ago?
Massive thanks to NickM for this wonderful signature! :)

Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
WalfordE20
Member Avatar

Technically I don't quite get how, if it is Jane, Emma worked it out simply because her car wasn't visible in Fatboy's video. It could have been moved and parked further down the road, just out of shot.

I've given up trying to work it out. I just hope that when the truth is finally revealed, we can read back through this thread to see what we picked up and take comfort in the knowledge we weren't talking out of our backsides.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Katie
Default Avatar

That's why I think she must have realised more than that. Even if she knew Jane had gone somewhere in her car, it wouldn't prove she had killed Lucy. If that's all the evidence she had then I'd expect Jane to make up a story about where she'd gone and why she lied.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dan
Member Avatar


Emma was dying at the time, she was confused and disorientated.

I wonder if she thought she was talking to Jane?

Posted Image

Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon...

Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic »
Add Reply