| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,919 Views) | |
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 01:32 Post #241 |
|
Soapsquawk didnt specifically ask for confirmation |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 01:44 Post #242 |
|
I don't believe the stuff on Twitter. Les Coker has been a recurring character off and on for years. Plus, he was visibly nervous when dealing with Charlie Cotton, first in bringing the coffin to Dot's house. He was also worried about what was in the coffin. And when Charlie gave him money, he was even more nervous. I would take this with a big pinch of salt, because if it's true, then this storyline would have no impact on Walford changing forever; instead, it would be this era's Darren-Impregnates-Heather. Lucy was killed by someone she knew. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 01:45 Post #243 |
|
I would hope he's pissing himself laughing at the absurdity of it. How NOT to get casual viewers back. |
![]() |
|
| Jade | 27 Apr 2014, 01:51 Post #244 |
|
Not being on twitter I am not au fait with everything, asked a mate who got it who also watches EE what she thought and she said this person has lots of followers. Far more than just a simple fan account.. I mean people put fake spoilers on twitter all the time but this person has like 62k followers including some of the journos? But like I said I am not au fait with twitter so from others who are does it look genuine? |
|
Your approval is neither desired nor required. Julia Smith "We decided to go for a realistic, fairly outspoken type of drama which could encompass stories about homosexuality, rape, unemployment, racial prejudice, etc., in a believable context. Above all, we wanted realism". | |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 01:51 Post #245 |
|
Check out @MrOldLady's Tweet: https://twitter.com/MrOldLady/status/460152576424837120 True or not their absolutely sticking to their guns. IF it is true then I dont think its very good. |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 01:53 Post #246 |
|
You make some very fair points and the person concerned is sticking to their guns.Odd. Edited by Queen Florence Serene, 27 Apr 2014, 01:56.
|
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Leon | 27 Apr 2014, 02:54 Post #247 |
|
Definitely not true. Would be changed if it was now anyway.
Edited by Leon, 27 Apr 2014, 02:56.
|
![]() |
|
| Leon | 27 Apr 2014, 03:05 Post #248 |
|
Doesn't look genuine. The grammar is awful, structure is all over the place and it's all downright confusing. He only has 200 odd tweets yet over 60k followers. With him not being a celebrity that makes it a strong possibility that he has bought his followers. 99% of his tweets have been jokes such as "Broken cross? Call CruciFix" and although he reiterates that the "leak" isn't a joke he describes himself in his twitter bio as a "comedian and joke teller". I highly doubt that DTC leaked it, or that the other 3 people he told would have. There would be a huge amount of trust between DTC and the other three so he wouldn't have taken the decision to tell them lightly. Probably would have been a contract they had to sign and I doubt anybody would be stupid enough to risk a high-up, powerful job within the BBC's arguably most popular show. To sum the "leak" up (and excuse my French): A load of bullshit. |
![]() |
|
| Jade | 27 Apr 2014, 03:26 Post #249 |
|
Thanks like I said I am not au fait with such things. I had no idea people were bought lol. |
|
Your approval is neither desired nor required. Julia Smith "We decided to go for a realistic, fairly outspoken type of drama which could encompass stories about homosexuality, rape, unemployment, racial prejudice, etc., in a believable context. Above all, we wanted realism". | |
![]() |
|
| Charper | 27 Apr 2014, 03:55 Post #250 |
|
Oh definitely, I posted that before I read the twitter rumours. No one would be impacted by it if it was Les. If this was Hollyoaks then I'd say it was him. I'm very interested into knowing what part he played in this Charlie/Nick scenario, most likely needed money to set up again Walford? Also the twitter account just looks like one big troll to me. I do hate twitter sometimes. |
![]() |
|
| Charper | 27 Apr 2014, 03:57 Post #251 |
|
Agree with Leon. DTC wouldn't leak it so that would leave 3 people. It wouldn't be hard to suss out who leaked it and no ones that stupid to risk their job over this. Some account just wants some more followers. |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 04:15 Post #252 |
|
But if its a serial killer and other residents die that surely will change the square forever? |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Josh | 27 Apr 2014, 05:58 Post #253 |
|
I read the twitter 'spoiler'. I really hope it isn't true for two reasons; I personally don't like the idea. I think it seems to lack realism and impact. Mainly though, I hope it isn't true as I wouldn't want it ruined for DTC and his trusted four after they've gone to such lengths to craft what is so far an incredible story kept under lock and key. |
| |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 27 Apr 2014, 09:35 Post #254 |
![]()
|
The 'Coker' clue could be a red herring, or a genuine clue though. It does make sense, and I called it hours before the tweet if so!! The way Pam was with Alfie, and we already know Les has had fake business from Dot...something sinister about this couple for sure. |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 27 Apr 2014, 09:42 Post #255 |
![]()
|
They are also front, centre of the publicity trailer pic.... |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 27 Apr 2014, 10:02 Post #256 |
|
I was going to avoid it but after hearing how ridiculous it all sounded, I couldn't resist. There is absolutely no way this can be true and I think it's insane that somebody can go on Twitter claiming to have received an email from a 'friend' which reveals the outcome of the storyline. Even forgetting how ridiculous the storyline sounds, we know for a fact that very few people know the full details of this story. So why would a BBC employee (presumably a high up one if they're one of the few to know the full storyline) jeopardise their job to email a friend the entire storyline? They'd at least leak it to a newspaper and try and get some money from it, I'd imagine - not a random friend who can spill it over Twitter. Linking to that, the Twitter poster says they want to keep the person who leaked it anonymous, but it wouldn't take DTC very long to work out who it was, given that less than half a dozen people would have access to such information. So, if it were true, this Twitter poster can't really value his friendship with the person who leaked it, given that they'd lose their job and may face disciplinary action over leaking it. Good job that this 'friend' is imaginary then... Then there's the storyline itself which goes against everything DTC has said previously. Although there's going to be twists and turns, he said he wants the storyline to be rooted in truth, and that the killer shouldn't be a huge shock. Making a character who neither Lucy nor the Beales have properly interacted with the killer would be ludicrous. And it's just nonsensical anyway - so Les Coker wants to drum up business for his funeral parlour and this 'leak' states he could have killed up to 7 people in the past. If that were the case, he'd have been out of business months ago. In what way does bumping off the odd person here and there in anyway drum up business? He'd have to be massacring them by the dozen to even get any proper return. Apart from anything, it just doesn't make good business sense. I'm fairly sure DTC isn't batting an eyelid and it astounds me that this joker is getting their 15 minutes of fame for this inept piece of fan fiction. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 27 Apr 2014, 10:03 Post #257 |
|
The publicity trailer pic which came before this whole thing was written. I imagine this 'leaked' storyline has been written to fit the clues, rather than the other way round. |
| |
![]() |
|
| TellyAddict | 27 Apr 2014, 10:14 Post #258 |
![]() ![]()
|
There's also the fact that the person claims that this has all come from a source close to the writers, even though we've already been told that none of the writers actually know who the culprit is yet. It's just DTC and presumably Alex Lamb, Alison Davis and Sharon Batten who know for now. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 27 Apr 2014, 10:17 Post #259 |
![]()
|
works for me, my money's on Les & Pam. |
![]() |
|
| Walford East | 27 Apr 2014, 10:32 Post #260 |
|
Revenge Is A Dish Best Served Cold
|
Its obviously a load of rubbish. Only four people in the whole crew know. I'm now convinced its Lee. I read an interesting theory about how in all murder dramas they usually have the killer play no major part in the aftermarth. Lee and Cindy have both left Walford. Both however will be back. Mimi Keene will be 15 when this story reaches its climax so will be on limited working hours. This I think rules her out. Lee however it doesn't. DTC said he wanted the story to be rooted in truth and make sense to the viewers. Lee is suffering PTS. This has been subtly hinted at but not too much focus has been given to it as of yet. Remember the press release about the killer might not being aware they murdered Lucy? if Lee was in a PTS episode then its perfectly plausible he didn't realise what he was doing and that it will come back to him in a flashback much later......... While not a suspect Lee is the first Walford resident outside of the family to have his DNA taken. The hidden in plain sight rule comes in again. Linda's 'I know all my kids' line is also another giveaway. Edited by Walford East, 27 Apr 2014, 10:40.
|
![]() Excellence is taught, knowledge is power, Forgiveness sets you free | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Register for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |












7:46 PM Jul 11