| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,918 Views) | |
| Will Slater-Mitchell | 27 Apr 2014, 12:21 Post #261 |
|
I think whoever wrote it has a great imagination. I don't believe it's true for a second. The writers don't know who did it, so why would an email be sent around with the killers identity in it. It being Les Coker is far too obvious anyway and would have no impact other than, oh. Ok. I do like the idea of a serial killer story, remember the Walford stalker years ago? But no, this isn't real. |
![]() |
|
| Nick | 27 Apr 2014, 12:56 Post #262 |
|
Even if it was Les, which I don't believe it is, I don't think there will be more than one murder because that will take the impact off of 'Who Killed Lucy' and make it 'Who Killed All These People', and plus I don't think there's that many 'successful' people on the Square apart from like Sharon, Ian, Phil etc and I doubt they are gonna get murdered. Unless I have misunderstood what the "spoiler" was saying. |
![]() If you'd like me to make a sig, send a message - NickM | |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 27 Apr 2014, 13:09 Post #263 |
|
And that would be every single one of her kids that didn't turn out how she planned. Seems a bit unfair on poor Linda, but I like your idea very much. |
![]() |
|
| Ennui | 27 Apr 2014, 13:29 Post #264 |
![]()
I've got my eye on you
![]()
|
I agree. He says he has an email that was sent to a small number of story liners outlining the plot. This seems unlikely because DTC said only 4 people know who did it and also the writers have confirmed they don't know and that DTC has asked them to add certain scenes in. Seems like a troll to me. Says he's a comedian, but all he posts are old jokes he's nicked off Sickipedia. |
|
You can't just come bounding in here like John Wayne on a Spacehopper! | |
![]() |
|
| Mormon Girl | 27 Apr 2014, 14:06 Post #265 |
|
Mimi is 16 soon she is 15 at the moment on the CBBC programme it said before she got the part in Eastenders that she was 14 and in Year 10 |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 27 Apr 2014, 16:03 Post #266 |
|
That twitter spoiler is quite clearly a load of rubbish and I find it concerning that some people are buying it.
Edited by Bec, 27 Apr 2014, 16:04.
|
![]() |
|
| Katedahlia | 27 Apr 2014, 17:43 Post #267 |
|
Oops
Edited by Katedahlia, 28 Apr 2014, 06:30.
|
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 27 Apr 2014, 18:03 Post #268 |
![]()
|
Personally I wasn't prepared to click on it, so all I had to go on was the reactions of other people who had, and many of the initial responses were that it seemed legit. |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 27 Apr 2014, 18:33 Post #269 |
![]()
|
I'd believe it. Infact, part of me does. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Carter | 27 Apr 2014, 18:39 Post #270 |
|
It would be a cop out if that was the outcome, it has to be someone closely related or someone she has at least spoken to.
Edited by Mr Carter, 27 Apr 2014, 18:39.
|
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 18:55 Post #271 |
|
You surprise me... |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 27 Apr 2014, 18:56 Post #272 |
![]()
|
But over the next few months these characters will become more established. It's very odd so far that their scenes have been Beale related, yet subtle. The first was how they arrived as part of the market merge, a battle Ian fought. Then the coffin outside the restaurant where Pam introduced herself to Jane, commented on the area and said how Ian's stress isn't good for him. Then later gossiping in the pub about the Beale family and Jane being an ex wife. Then the final comment about wearing the wristband in memory of Lucy and putting some flowers together at Alfie's request. It would make sense. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 18:58 Post #273 |
|
I think the word clearly is a bit of an overstatement. I neither believe or disbelieve it |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 19:00 Post #274 |
|
I think you make some very good points -I just had you pegged as sceptical on these type of things for some reason. Whats.unclear is the tweeters motivation-Im not really persuaded they bought their many 60,000 followers tbh as some have said. |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 27 Apr 2014, 19:01 Post #275 |
|
But I still don't understand what they could possibly gain out of it. Murdering one young woman is supposed to prop up and help their business? Even if they did become serial killers and bumped off a few more people, it's not enough to pay for the upkeep of their business. There's not even a guarantee Ian would choose to book the funeral with them. It all sounds far too Tim Burton to me, and the reasoning just doesn't stack up. To be honest, I can't believe someone on Twitter can claim to know the entire plot and manage to generate this much discussion. Fair play to them in that regard. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 27 Apr 2014, 19:05 Post #276 |
|
They're a self-proclaimed 'comedian' - perhaps their 60,000 followers find them amusing and that's fuelled them into writing a fake storyline for the biggest soap plot on television at the moment. You don't necessarily have to be a serial troll to do this sort of thing. And somebody who had only a couple of 100 followers wouldn't get as much airtime as this prankster is getting. It was only ever going to work for a 'comedian' with a relatively large following. And, clearly, it has worked. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Jade | 27 Apr 2014, 19:06 Post #277 |
|
One thing that is wrong is that its not the first serial killer on EE. Lucas Johnson? Edit and how could I forget Nick who killed Reg and Eddie Royle but I could say that is different to the spoiler type but Lucas isn't. Edited by Jade, 27 Apr 2014, 19:07.
|
|
Your approval is neither desired nor required. Julia Smith "We decided to go for a realistic, fairly outspoken type of drama which could encompass stories about homosexuality, rape, unemployment, racial prejudice, etc., in a believable context. Above all, we wanted realism". | |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 27 Apr 2014, 19:10 Post #278 |
|
The thing is, I would quite like a serial killer on EastEnders at some point - Lucas was a damp squib and every other British soap has had at least one really fantastic serial killer that had people gripped. I wouldn't want it to happen for a few years yet though, and definitely wouldn't want it used during this story. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 27 Apr 2014, 19:11 Post #279 |
|
Happy to discuss whether my word choice is an overstatement in 10 months time.
|
![]() |
|
| Jade | 27 Apr 2014, 19:12 Post #280 |
|
Very true but it said it was the first one which it clearly isn't so at least some of this is proved incorrect. |
|
Your approval is neither desired nor required. Julia Smith "We decided to go for a realistic, fairly outspoken type of drama which could encompass stories about homosexuality, rape, unemployment, racial prejudice, etc., in a believable context. Above all, we wanted realism". | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |













7:46 PM Jul 11