| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,789 Views) | |
| Mormon Girl | 4 Feb 2015, 19:58 Post #2841 |
|
Didn't DTC say very few people know what happened to Lucy on the night of Lucy's death even the person responsible for her death |
![]() |
|
| Mormon Girl | 4 Feb 2015, 20:17 Post #2842 |
|
I think with Ben Hardy leaving it would be obvious. |
![]() |
|
| Professor Plum | 4 Feb 2015, 20:18 Post #2843 |
|
This is the part that I dont get. Someone moved her body, so that means they know she was dead. WHY HAVENT THEY COME FORWARD???? If it is Peter, he is holding the secret well, but I guess the coke is helping blot it out. Where are the guilty consciences? But what about all the other people involved? I cant believe there are that many people and they are still not saying anything. No one keeps secrets like that for this long. Look at Nick, how long did it take for people to discover he wasnt dead? |
| Just livin' in perfect New Zealand! | |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 4 Feb 2015, 20:20 Post #2844 |
|
Ooh radio trails: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02j8mlg http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02j8lwb |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 4 Feb 2015, 20:22 Post #2845 |
|
God I hope it's not Peter. That'd be such an anti climax. |
![]() |
|
| Mormon Girl | 4 Feb 2015, 20:31 Post #2846 |
|
I agree. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordFanatic | 4 Feb 2015, 20:59 Post #2847 |
|
Oooooh those radio trailers are rather creepy, especially hearing Lucy's voice. I'm CERTAIN it's Jane and/or Cindy or possibly Whitney now. |
![]() Thanks Nick | |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 4 Feb 2015, 21:29 Post #2848 |
|
I still think Jane having moved the body is plausible. Purely because if peter did know he'd killed her, it's to protect Ian. If it's him though I don't think he would know it, in which case Jane would be protecting both peter and Ian. It's the best explanation I can come up with. I just don't buy Jane covering for abi or max because of Tanya or even Cindy with her dubious family link idea. I don't think that would be a strong enough reason. Of course I could be completely wrong!! Also with Ben hardy leaving, I found it odd he was mentioned with the xmen thing but is very vague when asked about it. Is he definately leaving? If so, if he didbt know and never found out his responsibility with Lucy he could leave, leaving Jane to take the blame. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Leon | 4 Feb 2015, 21:49 Post #2849 |
|
"I'd let him get away with murder..." Now I'm supporting the theory that Ian has killed her and Jane is covering for him. Why do I change my mind every day!? |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 4 Feb 2015, 22:03 Post #2850 |
|
Ben hardys contract must run out in June surely..? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 4 Feb 2015, 22:20 Post #2851 |
|
Peter was never addicted to cocaine. Lucy was. |
![]() |
|
| Slater11 | 4 Feb 2015, 22:21 Post #2852 |
|
I'm sticking with Jane. Would it be considered a damp squid if no-one actually killed Lucy after all and she killed herself instead? |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 4 Feb 2015, 22:24 Post #2853 |
|
The biggest con in the world. DTC would be totally discredited. |
![]() |
|
| Benjamin | 4 Feb 2015, 23:16 Post #2854 |
|
Lucy is mugged by Ben at the commons (neither recognizes the other) She has no phone to contact Peter & no money to buy drugs so her only option is to go back and tackle Ian again. She meets a drunk Jake and travels in a cab with him back to Walford as she has no money herself. Jake is so drunk that she struggles to support him on her own. (This was what Emma twigged in the pub with the Dean 5 minute comment) Abi and/or Max help her get Jake to his flat where her earring falls. Abi and/or Max row with Lucy, there is a coming together but Lucy leaves. This is the Good Friday secret between Abi & Max. Emma met Abi who explained her side of the story, after which Emma decides that she cant "keep the secret" It was "still murder" so any information that Abi has must be shared with the police. Raging at this stage Lucy arrives home, she brutalizes Ian who in distress eventually pushes her away and runs to his car, and subsequently ends up in Rainie. Denise has heard the exchange but is horrified to find that Lucy is dead in the kitchen having banged her head when Ian pushed her. In a panic she calls Jane. They decide that this will destroy Ian and all the family and they need to cover it up. Denise heard Lucy tell Ian that she had been mugged at the common and they decide if her body turns up there that the police will believe the mugger killed her. From Emmas info & phone Lauren will discover that Abi was her prime suspect. Abi will be arrested but Max will plead guilty to save her. (end of live episode Thursday 19th) Flashback reveals that Ian is the one responsible. Friday wedding comes down to Jane & Denise. Jane pleads with Denise to keep the secret. Does Denise tell the truth or leave it be. |
![]() |
|
| See You Slater | 5 Feb 2015, 00:00 Post #2855 |
![]()
|
I was thinking about that the other night, actually. DTC said 'No one knows exactly what happened to Lucy on the night she died, except very few people - even the person responsible for her death.' I think this was taking too literally, and that it actually means that there are only a few people in the crew who know what happened to Lucy, and the 'even the person responsible for her death' bit means that the actor playing the killer wouldn't know either. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 5 Feb 2015, 00:14 Post #2856 |
|
If she met several people on her last night then no one would know what happened exactly. If the killer left her alive and someone else saw her die /found her dead then they wouldn't know exactly either. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Dan | 5 Feb 2015, 00:47 Post #2857 |
![]() ![]()
|
Lucy had an open head wound. Unless she hit herself with something until she passed out, that couldn't work. It's definitely one of the Beale family. It is a standard soap trip to drive the happiness levels up to epic proportions to bring them crashing back down when the truth comes out and only the emotional impact of it being a Beale would work. Lee, Max, Abi or Whitney would now be a huge anti-climax. It's Ian, Jane or Peter. |
![]() Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon... Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig! | |
![]() |
|
| Dan | 5 Feb 2015, 00:53 Post #2858 |
![]() ![]()
|
What puts me off the theory that the killer doesn't know what happened to Lucy (if they were in their right mind and did meet Emma at the park) is that open head wounds bleed profusely and not just a little bit of blood either. My mate was hit by a car a few years ago, received a minor gash on his head but bled all over the place and witnesses thought his injury was much more serious than it was. Watch a professional wrestling match too where a wrestler blades (hidden razorblade, make a cut on the temple) too. There is a lot of blood. If someone had hit Lucy to the point where they cut her head open, they couldn't have failed to miss how serious her injury was whether it was a new wound or whether it re-opened the wound she received in Max's office so she bled to death. Whoever killed her may not have known what went on before they met Lucy or what happened to her body if someone else moved her. They also may not have known if they were having a psychotic episode at the time or if the trauma caused them to block it out completely and they can't remember. If the killer was of sound mind and remembers what happened, there is no way they can't know that they killed Lucy. |
![]() Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon... Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig! | |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 5 Feb 2015, 01:37 Post #2859 |
|
If it has to be a Beale and I do see why the story would have more impact if it was, I hope it's Jane. Peter would be a damp squib and predictable as we know he's leaving. And Ian I just couldn't buy even if it happened and he blocked it out. It just wouldn't work for me. Jane seems too obvious and I think her character is too grounded to become a killer but perhaps, if handled the right way, it could work. And I think she's the one with the most potential for dramatic fallout. I'm starting to lean towards the theory that Cindy killed her and Jane covered it up though. I think revealing Cindy as the killer has the potential to be anti climactic also but if Jane is heavily involved in the deception, I think there's still a lot of drama to be had. Right now, my two theories are Whitney as the killer or Cindy with Jane covering it up. I think these are most likely and also the best routes for the story to go down in terms of what makes sense and what could cause the most fallout. Edited by Bec, 5 Feb 2015, 01:38.
|
![]() |
|
| WalfordGirl | 5 Feb 2015, 11:53 Post #2860 |
|
Jake Wood's big Twitter announcement.... So, Jake Wood has a big Twitter announcement... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |













7:44 PM Jul 11