| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,917 Views) | |
| WalfordE20 | 27 Apr 2014, 19:15 Post #281 |
![]()
|
Hopefully it's not true. I've not clicked the link but I now know roughly what it says so fingers crossed it turns out to be rubbish. I suspect it is, but there's not quite enough clarity for me to believe either way at the moment. |
![]() |
|
| TimWil | 27 Apr 2014, 19:22 Post #282 |
|
I called it first! Pam Coker...heh! She's been portrayed as being too good to be true from the outset. I think there's a veritable dragon underneath that "warm" exterior. It will be interesting if we'll ever get to see her and Les interact privately. Are they getting their own flat set?
Edited by TimWil, 27 Apr 2014, 19:31.
|
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 27 Apr 2014, 19:42 Post #283 |
![]()
|
They either live above the Funeral Directors or the flat above the betting shop where Annie Palmer and Louise Raymond used to live, according to the BBC profiles. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 20:07 Post #284 |
|
Actually the word clearly in this context isnt dependent on vindication either way in 10 months but is a word used to say something is obvious now.It may turn out your belief its rubbish is correct but that doesnt mean its obvious at this moment in time. Its a difficult situation to read which is why I say I neither believe or disbelieve. |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 27 Apr 2014, 20:34 Post #285 |
|
Love how passionate you are about the English language, Florence. We need more people like you these days. Fair enough, I'll post a summary of why this is 'clearly' rubbish tomorrow when I've more time. |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 20:46 Post #286 |
|
Thank You! Looking forward to it!
|
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Professor Plum | 27 Apr 2014, 21:45 Post #287 |
|
I dont think the tweet is 100% right, but there could be some truth in it. We know the most glaring incorrect fact, is the serial killer. Lucas Johnson was that. He was starting to like it towards the end, and really losing the plot. Nick Cotton killed two people we know of, but they were very separate killings, not related at all. But about Nick, is he really dead? We are lead to believe he isnt, and I think we have had confirmation from DTC he isnt. So if not, what is his game? What has he to gain by faking his death? Cant be just to come back and kill Lucy. He barely knows her, and has no axe to grind with Ian. I must admit, the name "Coker" did cross my mind, but again, who is this Charlie Cotton and why has he come back after so many years? Why is he so interested in Dot? She hasnt any money this week (did she ever pay the council back?) None of the Brannings have any money, and Nick would probably not be that aware of Dots new family. So I think we need to know a bit more about what is going on here. It will be related somehow. If it is the Cokers, then I guess Tracey might be in the firing line next. Doesnt she also have a flower stall??? But, seriously, do we know how Lucy died yet? Also DTC said the killer will be someone with an impact. I dont think the new characters (with the exception of the Carters, and even then, that will be minimal) will have that much impact. Its not Terry, as in, a cab driver thats always there, but no one sees. The other big thing that concerns me, is we know how competent the Walford police are! :'( Edited by Professor Plum, 27 Apr 2014, 21:47.
|
| Just livin' in perfect New Zealand! | |
![]() |
|
| *Betty* | 27 Apr 2014, 21:53 Post #288 |
![]() ![]()
|
Mick threw the game. Alfie and Terry won. The Carter kids went off to the party. At some point he must have slipped out of the party, probably to make his phonecall to Lucy which we heard as her body was unveiled. |
| |
![]() |
|
| TimWil | 27 Apr 2014, 22:36 Post #289 |
|
I think Alfie giving Pam that black arm band and calling her "lovely" was the Kiss of Death for him. I think he's next to be dispatched! |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 27 Apr 2014, 22:46 Post #290 |
![]()
|
It does make so much sense, right down to their surnames. 'coker'...and 'charlie' ....surely it's a massive clue. |
![]() |
|
| DirtyDen | 27 Apr 2014, 22:47 Post #291 |
|
DirtyDen(ise)
|
I'm calling it now... It's going to be Tracey. She will know everything that goes on in the square without ever being in the frame for anything major. She's a psycho! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 23:41 Post #292 |
|
If this is true, then the entire 30th Anniversary will go up in smoke. What's going to happen? Is everyone on the Square going to lose a family member to satiate the greed of Les Coker? There is one thing people will always need in life and that's an undertaker. This premise would be treating the 30th anniversary like a joke. This could be a red herring, because sometimes the PR team put out test spoilers to fool the media and test the public's reaction. Remember the spoiler about Darren Miller having a threesome with Libby Fox and another girl? Ben setting fire to the Vic after Peggy told him off for playing with matches? The posh unknown Mitchell brother? I'd be very angry if this turned out to be the result. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 23:43 Post #293 |
|
There was a person on the old WW who stuck to his guns that Sam Mitchell was secretly returning and would be unveiled as Phil's stalker. We all know how that turned out. |
![]() |
|
| Queen Florence Serene | 27 Apr 2014, 23:48 Post #294 |
|
I await developments with "interest"! |
| Don't be lazy destiny needs some proactive nudges | |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 23:50 Post #295 |
|
Les was very much the Indian in the body-in-the-box affair, and Charlie was calling the shots. Les was extremely reluctant throughout this whole ordeal. He constantly reiterated to Charlie that he would lose his livelihood - a family business which had been in existence almost 100 years - if people found out what had happened. That doesn't sound like a psychopathic serial killer to me. Besides, Les Coker has been familiar to most of the Walford residents all their adult lives. A murderous undertaker would take the soap to a level of campness that would be disrespectful to its 30th Anniversary episode, and it would serve no purpose in changing Walford forever. FGS, there is a psychopath loose on the Square who has murdered in the past and will probably murder again. But it ain't Les Coker. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 27 Apr 2014, 23:57 Post #296 |
|
The reason he's the first suspect outside the family to have his DNA taken is obvious. Post-mortem examination would have established that Lucy had had sex within the 24 hours before her death. Someone - was it Cindy? - mentioned she was seeing "Lee, from the pub." They are eliminating suspects at this stage, but asked for Lee's clothes he'd been wearing that night and a DNA sample. The police who are investigating are also acting on the premise that a person who meets a violent end, usually knows the person who killed them. Your theory has some substance. |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 28 Apr 2014, 00:10 Post #297 |
|
Could you imagine if this is the one and only huge story for Tracey lol!! I love the idea even if it will never happen |
| |
![]() |
|
| comedybeard | 28 Apr 2014, 00:16 Post #298 |
|
I read the spoiler and it sounds like a load of rubbish. For a start, the tweet says that the killer is outed on NYE 2014, but the Who Killed Lucy storyline has been planned to run until February 2015. To me, it doesn't make sense for the killer to be outed two months before the 30th anniversary. I suspect we won't know who killed Lucy and why until the 19 February episode. Also, why would Les need to be a serial killer to kickstart his business? People die from natural causes every day and he already has an established business. There's a difference between being a bit dodgy to being a murderer and I think Les is just dodgy. Finally, the user's Twitter profile says he's an 'asshole' and I'm inclined to agree with him. |
![]() |
|
| Dan | 28 Apr 2014, 01:02 Post #299 |
![]() ![]()
|
There's more chance of being The Undertaker than that undertaker. Perhaps he gave Lucy a tombstone piledriver onto that branch. Les might be up to his neck in something and will probably be in deep something if it's ever found out but there's more chance it was Dot than Les. It remains to be seen if this a serial killer we are going to end up dealing with. But I would imagine they would kill again and if Lucy's death is related to drugs, Jake is going to that great pub in the sky. He looked shifty, paranoid, sweaty and incredibly tormented and guilty whenever a Beale (or a Clarke) is around. I think he is a patsy who either knows what happened to Lucy or didn't report her death who will be bumped off when he decides to sing like a bird to the police. As for Nick being dead, definitely not. It remains to be seen whether Nick is involved in whatever "Charlie" is up to or not involved. My theory is that Nick isn't one to call Dot to shoot the breeze as it were and if wants her, it's for a reason. He tried to call her twice perhaps because he gathered something like this might go down and was actually trying to warn her before giving up. |
![]() Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon... Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig! | |
![]() |
|
| TimWil | 28 Apr 2014, 01:21 Post #300 |
|
I suspect Pam also murdered Jonathan Ross' mother to take over her flowers stall. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |

















7:46 PM Jul 11