| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,771 Views) | |
| Swirly | 14 Feb 2015, 21:19 Post #3201 |
|
Someone mentioning symbolism..Could there be something in the fact that this is all being revealed the week lent begins? Or is it just coincidental that she was killed on Good Friday and then it all comes out as the lead up to Easter begins again. |
![]() |
|
| Roly | 14 Feb 2015, 21:34 Post #3202 |
|
Apparently there might be a death in live episode. We are going to be teased with something big tomorrow and there are rumours going around this is it. My guess is either Stan or Dean. I can't see who else it could be really. |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 14 Feb 2015, 21:42 Post #3203 |
![]()
|
Stan is around until April. I have heard Dean will meet his maker on Friday as his year long contract expires this month. |
| |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 14 Feb 2015, 22:10 Post #3204 |
|
Oh. Lauren works at Beale's restaurant. That's why she recognises the number. |
![]() |
|
| Winters | 14 Feb 2015, 22:29 Post #3205 |
|
I was also thinking we will (most likely) have something new major starting up from Easter. |
![]() |
|
| DRAPPLEdreamers1992 | 14 Feb 2015, 23:22 Post #3206 |
![]()
|
God weird that they haven't shown Lauren in Ian's restaurant for half a year. But yeah I'm actually pretty certain Lucy was killed in Ian's restaurant, she woke up there at the start of the episode and it would leave more of an emotional blow on the audience for her to die there. Also the restaurant was featured heavily in the episode following. Particularly the kitchen (seriously watch the episode lots of dangerous artillery lying around, anything goes in there) I also can't believe it was Denise or that she could've slept through what happened to her.. I think Lucy was planning to move out and stay at the flats for a while. Or go down to Brighton where I think Ben was during Ian's breakdown. Hence the note she writes on a pad in the promo pictures, She takes the jewellery box with her for sentimental reasons, looking at the size of the box it can easily fit in Lucy's now empty bag. Then she went to Ian's restaurant to collect something she'd left earlier that morning as her and Lee were chased out of the restaurant. She could've left something behind or wanted to nick money from the till to support her fare ETC, since she was mugged earlier. So yeah, I'm sure the Beal's house is a red herring to throw us off scent of who the killer could be. Edited by DRAPPLEdreamers1992, 14 Feb 2015, 23:27.
|
![]() |
|
| WalfordFanatic | 14 Feb 2015, 23:42 Post #3207 |
|
Do you think we will find out the murderous culprit(s) at the end of the 19:30-20:30 episode or during the flashback episode? |
![]() Thanks Nick | |
![]() |
|
| Bec | 14 Feb 2015, 23:49 Post #3208 |
|
The flashback. We'll see a character confess to killing Lucy at the end of the hour long episode and then the flashback will show us who really did it. |
![]() |
|
| DRAPPLEdreamers1992 | 14 Feb 2015, 23:56 Post #3209 |
![]()
|
yep hence the Ronnie vs. Emma last second switch death on new years day... and then tricking us when Nick died in Thursday's episode only so he could really die on the Fridays' trick. It seems to be the a staple of D T W. Bet they'll do the same with whoever is offed in the live week. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordFanatic | 15 Feb 2015, 00:01 Post #3210 |
|
Thought so, but part of me thought they'd narrow it down to 2-3 at the end of the hour episode and make everyone tune back in for the flashback episode to find out the actual killer. Otherwise, many casual viewers may find out who the killer is at the end of the hour ep and obviously then know the killer and not actually tune in for the flashback. |
![]() Thanks Nick | |
![]() |
|
| eastend90 | 15 Feb 2015, 00:24 Post #3211 |
![]()
|
This probably should be in the other thread but that's an interesting development since Matt was meant to in talks about renewing his contacting but if this does come off this mean we were right all along when those rumors were denied several months ago anyhow back to Lucy and after what Lauren wrote in the card yesterday, i'm down to 4 (possibly 5) suspects-Ian Jane, Peter or Cindy (with an outside chance of it being Denise)-surely after what Lauren wrote, the culprit has to come from the inner Beale circle (which why I've included Denise just in case since she was still in a relationship with Ian at the time of the murder.) |
![]() |
|
| Kim | 15 Feb 2015, 00:27 Post #3212 |
|
Always possible that the "Matt wants to stay" articles were an Emma type decoy. |
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 15 Feb 2015, 01:00 Post #3213 |
|
DTC must be laughing his head off... Whilst pulling the strings! This is absolutely hilare! he obviously will not be revealing anything 'til the last minute and with 5 or 6 twists in the 29 minutes running up to it! He knows we are not dumb he knows we enjoy the drama he knows that we like to understand and follow the string he lays out for us... And then changes tack and we explore the next string... Why do we let him toy with us???? Because: we LOVE IT! So he continues to do so 'til his deadline is up... Let's face it he doesn't do obvious, paints the police elite as lovesick puppy ex (Bryant), looking for Lucy in Max's pants (Shaggerhayes), indignant cow (Keeble), not quite convinced that Emma got it right, or even that the true culprit knows it was them!! Lauren figuring it out is slightly more believable but sounds like she is using the carried error of Emma's assumptions... I think we will all be very pleased when DTC doesn't disappoint by giving us an ending and killer that he didn't put a neon sign above :)))
|
![]() |
|
| astrum1989 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:02 Post #3214 |
|
I have a couple of theories but I really do think it could a few different ways at this point. There are however a number ideas that I think have to be right... 1) Lauren is wrong about the killer- Lauren is dropping heavy hints about the killer being Jane or Ian. There's no way they would spoil the surprise this close to the reveal. I think Lauren accusing who she thinks the killer is will cause the real killer to come forward. 2) Whoever killed Lucy didn't mean to - I can't see any of the suspects being cold blooded killers plus we have that line from Emma (something like- "it's still murder"). I'm guessing an accidental death or a struggle gone too far. 3) The killer isn't going to be punished for their crime. Whether the police blame it on Nasty Nick or they never find out I just can't see anyone going down. Edited by astrum1989, 15 Feb 2015, 01:02.
|
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 15 Feb 2015, 01:05 Post #3215 |
|
Dtc has said that the killer is a monster. I guess that's probably largely based on perception. But if a beale killed her even by accident, staged a mugging and pretend not to know anything and continued to live in the beales household, I can see that as cold blooded and a monstrous act. |
| |
![]() |
|
| astrum1989 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:06 Post #3216 |
|
I'm not saying they are an angel but I mean cold-blooded as in they went in to that scenario with the intention of killing Lucy. I don't think that was the case but I may be wrong. |
![]() |
|
| Slater11 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:24 Post #3217 |
|
Let's be honest... ALL of them did it, you never know what truly goes on in the twisted minds of the characters heads:p. |
![]() |
|
| Blondie08 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:26 Post #3218 |
|
It wouldn't discredit if the flats was when she was with Jake earlier in the evening?! Your theory could still be right
|
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 15 Feb 2015, 01:29 Post #3219 |
|
I thought it was a misquote? Ie he said the killer is amongst them as per trailer slogan but a journalist misheard? |
![]() |
|
| Blondie08 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:31 Post #3220 |
|
You could be on to something here... I have been speculating with my friend for ages what if lucy was planning something to completely throw everyone in turmoil, like kill herself but make it look like lots of them were suspects hence one of her social media posts about people never underestimating her again! Bit far fetched but her death looking like suicide to others who moved her is a great call.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |










he obviously will not be revealing anything 'til the last minute and with 5 or 6 twists in the 29 minutes running up to it! He knows we are not dumb he knows we enjoy the drama he knows that we like to understand and follow the string he lays out for us... And then changes tack and we explore the next string... Why do we let him toy with us???? Because: we LOVE IT! So he continues to do so 'til his deadline is up... Let's face it he doesn't do obvious, paints the police elite as lovesick puppy ex (Bryant), looking for Lucy in Max's pants (Shaggerhayes), indignant cow (Keeble), not quite convinced that Emma got it right, or even that the true culprit knows it was them!! Lauren figuring it out is slightly more believable but sounds like she is using the carried error of Emma's assumptions... I think we will all be very pleased when DTC doesn't disappoint by giving us an ending and killer that he didn't put a neon sign above :)))

7:44 PM Jul 11