Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about.

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories
Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,770 Views)
Kim
Default Avatar

Thinking back to the monster thing, Cindy seems more of a possibility. After the drugs thing, I don't think Peter could stay in the house if he killed Lucy.

Plus DTC does seem to be copying from the Santer era somewhat, so turning Cindy's I's other illegitimate kid into a psycho would fit that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
astrum1989
Default Avatar

Swirly
14 Feb 2015, 21:19
Someone mentioning symbolism..Could there be something in the fact that this is all being revealed the week lent begins? Or is it just coincidental that she was killed on Good Friday and then it all comes out as the lead up to Easter begins again.
Whether they planned it that way or not I think there is symbolism there. Good Friday was the Crucifixion (representing Lucy's death) and the beginning of Lent is all about atoning for sins so it definitely makes sense.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
niteflyer
Default Avatar

I have a red herring it might turn out to be ian

He's been a suspect in he whodunits before which he never commited a crime as he's not the type to intentionally hurt anybody

What if he is really responsible now tho? surely he can't be a suspect in every crime / murder case and not being him? He's has more reason from previous storylines to have definitive motive for it
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Amazee-Dayzee
Default Avatar

Only thing is that if it was indeed Cindy II, it would be a giant letdown.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Michelle Fowler
Member Avatar
Michelle Fowler
Perhaps Cindy II has always harboured resentment towards Lucy because she believes if Cindy I had been able to run away to Spain with all 3 of her children she would still be alive today. Lucy being sent home sick put the wheels in motion which led to their mother's demise. Cindy II has always wanted Ian to treat her as his daughter and so she had a lot of resentment and jealousy towards Lucy.
There's her motive. I'm not quite sure where she murdered her and how she moved her body to the common.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
soetmo
Member Avatar

But she died in childbirth.....totally unrelated to fleeing to Italy etc...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Slater11
Member Avatar

Peter and Lauren are both top credits for the 24th Feb episode, that could still be a big bluff and they're doing a Emma style trick. It still doesn't rule both of them out yet IMO.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
WalfordE20
Member Avatar

I love how little we actually know about the reveal. I cannot believe we're only five days away.

It feels like only yesterday that the story was announced. I still maintain that in the long run killing Lucy Beale was a mistake, but it's been one hell of a ride. Possibly my favourite storyline ever.

Bring on live week.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
WalfordE20
Member Avatar

Final guess:

Cindy.

Jane has known all along. Max and Abi think Lucy died of her previous head injury.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gangstress
Default Avatar

Ummmm I had a dream last night that it was Tina Carter
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Winters
Member Avatar

There's also Halloween. Lauren was stalked by a ghost, who turned out to be Abi, on the night of the dead.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Winters
Member Avatar

.
Edited by Winters, 15 Feb 2015, 17:31.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
WalfordE20
Member Avatar

Gangstress
15 Feb 2015, 17:23
Ummmm I had a dream last night that it was Tina Carter
I had a bizarre dream involving Lucy dying at 10.34pm. She came into Ian's room, laid on the bed and started crying next to Denise. Patrick was hiding under the stairs, and there was a gang plotting to burn the house down.

I really should get out more.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
luisgarcia
Member Avatar

WalfordE20
15 Feb 2015, 17:45
Gangstress
15 Feb 2015, 17:23
Ummmm I had a dream last night that it was Tina Carter
I had a bizarre dream involving Lucy dying at 10.34pm. She came into Ian's room, laid on the bed and started crying next to Denise. Patrick was hiding under the stairs, and there was a gang plotting to burn the house down.

I really should get out more.
:D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
See You Slater
Member Avatar

Gangstress
15 Feb 2015, 17:23
Ummmm I had a dream last night that it was Tina Carter
I had a dream last night Kirk Norcross had died aged 24. God knows what our brains get up to when we're sleeping. :p
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sherlockwanabe
Default Avatar

Did anyone notice Dot telling Nick that she "created a monster" ie him?? can anyone categorically say whether or not DTC said monster or amongst them??
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ian
Member Avatar

sherlockwanabe
15 Feb 2015, 21:02
Did anyone notice Dot telling Nick that she "created a monster" ie him?? can anyone categorically say whether or not DTC said monster or amongst them??
Either way, it doesn't matter because it wasn't Nick.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
astrum1989
Default Avatar

I just watched the episode were Lucy is killed again. I'm just wondering on the timeline of events. The last time we see Lucy alive is when she begins walking towards the bus (I'm guessing). The pictures from the flashback ep tell us that she was back in her home at some point (writing something) and we know from the blood at Jake's (and the pic of her carrying him) that she was probably there there at some point.

So what's the general timeline of events? Watching the episode were she dies we are led to believe she is apprehended in the common but has it been confirmed since that she was killed on the square and moved or is it just a theory?

To be honest, after watching this ep again it's really reignited my suspicion of Denise but I still think Jane has played a part too.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mrs Peel
Member Avatar

Jade
14 Feb 2015, 15:58
If she died in her house they know. Doesn't matter how much you clean up in that space of time the luminal they would have used as standard in her house would react even with yes cleaned up blood. Considering they know she didn't die on the common that entire house would have luminal used so if she died there I am calling BS on the forensics.
Hell luminal reacts to murder scenes years old.
Well, this is one of the holes in the story.

When someone is killed, the police work on the assumption that the victim knew the killer and start with those closest to her. They would have been all over Ian and Peter like a bad rash. They gave a cursory questioning of Ian, but no one has questioned Peter. He's also the one we don't know anything about his whereabouts on the night Lucy was killed.

And they would have gone over the Beale house with any and all sorts of technology to detect blood.

This isn't the police as much as it is the writers, but there you go.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mrs Peel
Member Avatar

WalfordE20
14 Feb 2015, 19:07
Winters
14 Feb 2015, 19:02

Quoting limited to 2 levels deep
That's why I'm a little reluctant, but she's been under the Beales' roof, and I don't know if they'd turn another major character into a killer after Stacey. It's not the most dramatic outcome possible, and it's not my favourite idea, but I can see them running with it. I've just got a feeling.
This is what worries me - that this is going to become a reprise of the 25th Anniversary - with the storyline being played out until Christmas 2015. Laurie Brett was putting it out in an interview in 2014 that the killer wouldn't necessarily have to leave the show.

Bollocks.

This is an important legacy character here, the daughter of an original character who plays an important part in the show, and her killer won't get punishment?

Well, here's a way ... they blame the death on Nick. He's dead, he was bad, and he was involved in drugs. Easy cop-out.

But I don't see how her killer could remain unless Ian were kept in the dark about the real identity and actually thought Nick killed Lucy. If he knew, if the killer were Cindy or Jane, I think he'd go beserk; but there's only one person who could have accidentally killed Lucy, whom Ian would forgive - Peter. He'd forgive him, but he'd make sure he left the Square for a long time or else, Peter would self-impose exile.

I hope it isn't Cindy. Cindy, Abi or Whitney would have absolutely no impact on the show at all.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic »
Add Reply