| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,770 Views) | |
| Kim | 15 Feb 2015, 01:33 Post #3221 |
|
Thinking back to the monster thing, Cindy seems more of a possibility. After the drugs thing, I don't think Peter could stay in the house if he killed Lucy. Plus DTC does seem to be copying from the Santer era somewhat, so turning Cindy's I's other illegitimate kid into a psycho would fit that. |
![]() |
|
| astrum1989 | 15 Feb 2015, 01:47 Post #3222 |
|
Whether they planned it that way or not I think there is symbolism there. Good Friday was the Crucifixion (representing Lucy's death) and the beginning of Lent is all about atoning for sins so it definitely makes sense. |
![]() |
|
| niteflyer | 15 Feb 2015, 03:42 Post #3223 |
|
I have a red herring it might turn out to be ian He's been a suspect in he whodunits before which he never commited a crime as he's not the type to intentionally hurt anybody What if he is really responsible now tho? surely he can't be a suspect in every crime / murder case and not being him? He's has more reason from previous storylines to have definitive motive for it |
![]() |
|
| Amazee-Dayzee | 15 Feb 2015, 05:05 Post #3224 |
|
Only thing is that if it was indeed Cindy II, it would be a giant letdown. |
![]() |
|
| Michelle Fowler | 15 Feb 2015, 07:01 Post #3225 |
![]()
Michelle Fowler
|
Perhaps Cindy II has always harboured resentment towards Lucy because she believes if Cindy I had been able to run away to Spain with all 3 of her children she would still be alive today. Lucy being sent home sick put the wheels in motion which led to their mother's demise. Cindy II has always wanted Ian to treat her as his daughter and so she had a lot of resentment and jealousy towards Lucy. There's her motive. I'm not quite sure where she murdered her and how she moved her body to the common. |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 15 Feb 2015, 08:33 Post #3226 |
![]()
|
But she died in childbirth.....totally unrelated to fleeing to Italy etc... |
![]() |
|
| Slater11 | 15 Feb 2015, 14:06 Post #3227 |
|
Peter and Lauren are both top credits for the 24th Feb episode, that could still be a big bluff and they're doing a Emma style trick. It still doesn't rule both of them out yet IMO. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 15 Feb 2015, 16:34 Post #3228 |
![]()
|
I love how little we actually know about the reveal. I cannot believe we're only five days away. It feels like only yesterday that the story was announced. I still maintain that in the long run killing Lucy Beale was a mistake, but it's been one hell of a ride. Possibly my favourite storyline ever. Bring on live week. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 15 Feb 2015, 17:04 Post #3229 |
![]()
|
Final guess: Cindy. Jane has known all along. Max and Abi think Lucy died of her previous head injury. |
![]() |
|
| Gangstress | 15 Feb 2015, 17:23 Post #3230 |
|
Ummmm I had a dream last night that it was Tina Carter |
![]() |
|
| Winters | 15 Feb 2015, 17:28 Post #3231 |
|
There's also Halloween. Lauren was stalked by a ghost, who turned out to be Abi, on the night of the dead. |
![]() |
|
| Winters | 15 Feb 2015, 17:29 Post #3232 |
|
.
Edited by Winters, 15 Feb 2015, 17:31.
|
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 15 Feb 2015, 17:45 Post #3233 |
![]()
|
I had a bizarre dream involving Lucy dying at 10.34pm. She came into Ian's room, laid on the bed and started crying next to Denise. Patrick was hiding under the stairs, and there was a gang plotting to burn the house down. I really should get out more. |
![]() |
|
| luisgarcia | 15 Feb 2015, 17:50 Post #3234 |
![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| See You Slater | 15 Feb 2015, 19:19 Post #3235 |
![]()
|
I had a dream last night Kirk Norcross had died aged 24. God knows what our brains get up to when we're sleeping.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| sherlockwanabe | 15 Feb 2015, 21:02 Post #3236 |
|
Did anyone notice Dot telling Nick that she "created a monster" ie him?? can anyone categorically say whether or not DTC said monster or amongst them?? |
![]() |
|
| ian | 15 Feb 2015, 21:28 Post #3237 |
|
Either way, it doesn't matter because it wasn't Nick. |
![]() |
|
| astrum1989 | 15 Feb 2015, 23:00 Post #3238 |
|
I just watched the episode were Lucy is killed again. I'm just wondering on the timeline of events. The last time we see Lucy alive is when she begins walking towards the bus (I'm guessing). The pictures from the flashback ep tell us that she was back in her home at some point (writing something) and we know from the blood at Jake's (and the pic of her carrying him) that she was probably there there at some point. So what's the general timeline of events? Watching the episode were she dies we are led to believe she is apprehended in the common but has it been confirmed since that she was killed on the square and moved or is it just a theory? To be honest, after watching this ep again it's really reignited my suspicion of Denise but I still think Jane has played a part too. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 15 Feb 2015, 23:01 Post #3239 |
|
Well, this is one of the holes in the story. When someone is killed, the police work on the assumption that the victim knew the killer and start with those closest to her. They would have been all over Ian and Peter like a bad rash. They gave a cursory questioning of Ian, but no one has questioned Peter. He's also the one we don't know anything about his whereabouts on the night Lucy was killed. And they would have gone over the Beale house with any and all sorts of technology to detect blood. This isn't the police as much as it is the writers, but there you go. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 15 Feb 2015, 23:11 Post #3240 |
|
This is what worries me - that this is going to become a reprise of the 25th Anniversary - with the storyline being played out until Christmas 2015. Laurie Brett was putting it out in an interview in 2014 that the killer wouldn't necessarily have to leave the show. Bollocks. This is an important legacy character here, the daughter of an original character who plays an important part in the show, and her killer won't get punishment? Well, here's a way ... they blame the death on Nick. He's dead, he was bad, and he was involved in drugs. Easy cop-out. But I don't see how her killer could remain unless Ian were kept in the dark about the real identity and actually thought Nick killed Lucy. If he knew, if the killer were Cindy or Jane, I think he'd go beserk; but there's only one person who could have accidentally killed Lucy, whom Ian would forgive - Peter. He'd forgive him, but he'd make sure he left the Square for a long time or else, Peter would self-impose exile. I hope it isn't Cindy. Cindy, Abi or Whitney would have absolutely no impact on the show at all. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |











7:44 PM Jul 11