| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,882 Views) | |
| NevermindMe | 24 Aug 2014, 21:18 Post #981 |
![]()
|
I want to know why Aleks gave Honey the iPad. There was a deeper meaning than "so Roxy can't find out he's got kids". He's sent that iPad to half way across the world for a reason. |
| |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 25 Aug 2014, 05:04 Post #982 |
|
When it happened, I was like CLUE, CLUE, CLUE. But now I think it just foreshadowed him having a secret family. But I am very happy to be proven wrong, I'd love for it to be a clue. Also, Alfie gets the duff duff when the Walford Poilce turn up at the BBQ next week, #justsayin |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 25 Aug 2014, 21:08 Post #983 |
![]()
|
I've just seen the Walford Common Park CCTV footage for myself, and the audio is rather perplexing indeed. Also, I can't help but feel that the time is significant. Lucy was killed between 9.30 and 12.00 if my memory serves me correctly, and the footage is from 11.53. While no one can be seen, it makes me wonder how Lucy's killer isn't caught on camera moving her body. |
![]() |
|
| Jill-Sandwich | 25 Aug 2014, 21:19 Post #984 |
|
One of the best things about this Storyline is how its made me think everything is somehow important to it no matter how small, it could be intertwined in some way. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 25 Aug 2014, 21:44 Post #985 |
|
I watched that and - as you say - nothing happened, but wasn't that the entrance to the common, and just in the immediate foreground, wasn't the top of a car visible? If that's the case, then someone parked a car at the entrance, which would have meant that someone was within the common ground, getting shot of Lucy's body. |
![]() |
|
| JimRRR | 25 Aug 2014, 22:12 Post #986 |
|
not interested in who killed lucy or the fact that I have to wait until feb. 2015 to find out |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 25 Aug 2014, 22:17 Post #987 |
![]()
|
What confuses me though is why none of this CCTV has been referenced on the show? Surely if it had any substance then the police would have drawn attention to it. It just seems strange that there's been no mention of any footage other than that on the bus, which isn't nearly as helpful as that of the Common at the time Lucy's body was dumped. JimRRR, maybe this is the wrong thread for you.
|
![]() |
|
| TellyAddict | 25 Aug 2014, 22:23 Post #988 |
![]() ![]()
|
I get the feeling that the CCTV footage of the park entrance wasn't meant to be put up yet. I can't see why they'd intentionally upload footage with a conversation between production crew included. I assume it's something that will be visited at a later date. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Katie | 25 Aug 2014, 22:27 Post #989 |
|
As the CCTV hasn't been mentioned in the show I'm probably reading too much into it, but when it gets to 23.54 it jumps straight to 23.55.30. So that's a minute and a half missing. I don't know how big the common is supposed to be, but if that's the only camera I'm sure whoever moved her body could have found another way in anyway. |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 25 Aug 2014, 22:32 Post #990 |
![]()
|
How do we know Lucy's body was moved? We don't know for certain that she died in Jakes flat, just that blood was found there. The speculation of a moved body and an accomplice is all speculative. For all we know she was followed to the common and killed there, with the blood in Jakes flat being a torn wound from an earlier sustained head injury in the car lot. That injury happened for a reason. It can't be to highlight a recently cleaned car lot as that will need to have been picked up on by now. |
| |
![]() |
|
| JimRRR | 25 Aug 2014, 22:56 Post #991 |
|
Not all all....the wrong thread, that is. I'm just stating an opinion.... But if I had to play detective, I'd say it was Ben, Peter, maybe, even Ian. I also think it could be Danny. Or what about Ian. I enjoy a whodunit, but this murder isn't "EE" at it's very best. "Corrie" and "Hollyoaks" do the whodunit so much better |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 25 Aug 2014, 23:38 Post #992 |
![]()
|
We know the body was moved because the lack of blood on Walford Common disproved the theory that Lucy had collapsed and died where she was found. I respectfully disagree. I think this has been so much more than your usual whodunnit. Normally we see the initial build-up and everything but the murder itself happens on-screen. We usually know the why, how, when and where; everything except the who. In Lucy's case all these questions have been left open, so we have so much to speculate on. Granted, it's going to seem a slow journey until February 2015, but we're already four months in and I've already lost count of all the twists we've had. The best part? There's so much left to come. |
![]() |
|
| Shamelessness | 26 Aug 2014, 00:26 Post #993 |
![]()
|
The police said that they didn't think she was killed in Jake's flat because there was only a small amount of blood in there. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Jack1997 | 26 Aug 2014, 00:31 Post #994 |
|
Ian to Patrick in today's episode: "Peter's been looking after the allotment for ya." I really am warming to the idea that Peter was the killer. His desperation for leads means that he wants to cover his tracks. OR he knows something else. The allotment suggests that he is the one who buried the phone. |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 26 Aug 2014, 01:08 Post #995 |
|
Abi is totes getting her ass arrested next week. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 26 Aug 2014, 10:06 Post #996 |
|
Because the police say she wasn't killed where her body was found. Despite everyone saying that she had a subdural bleed, the police made it quite clear to the Beales that Lucy's head wound was an open one. Anytime you bump your head and break skin, there's an immense amount of bleeding because the skin covering the skull is thin and veinous, so head wounds often look worse than they are; but according to Lucy's post-mortem report, she died as a result of a blow to the head, and the wound must have been open, because the police mentioned the absence of blood at the place where her body was found. Wherever she died, there must would have been a huge amount of blood to clean, so wherever she was killed, someone must have been in the process of doing a massive cleaning job in the aftermath or else she was killed where blood on the floor wouldn't have looked out of the ordinary. The police are certain from forensic evidence that her body was moved and her purse and phone taken to make it look as though she were mugged on the spot. Going by what the police reckon, the person who killed Lucy either had to have the means of transporting her body, unnoticed, to the Common - either on their own or with an accomplice. If her killer were a woman or a girl, she would either have had to have access to a car or someone strong enough to move Lucy unnoticed. |
![]() |
|
| Jill-Sandwich | 26 Aug 2014, 11:03 Post #997 |
|
I dont recall a Corrie Whodunnit, outside of who killed Frank Foster, which was easy to solve. |
![]() |
|
| soetmo | 26 Aug 2014, 20:34 Post #998 |
![]()
|
Jay & Jake can now be ruled out. However Whitney, Peter, Lauren, Ian, Max, Abi, Billy and Lee still can't be ruled out, in my mind. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 26 Aug 2014, 21:52 Post #999 |
![]()
|
I'm still sticking by my theory that Peter's the killer, but somehow doesn't know. I can't imagine him being this determined to find the culprit if he knew he was guilty. There's the possibility that he wants to be caught rather than simply own up, but I feel that would be out of character. After all, nothing could be more upsetting than spending ten months chasing his sister's killer only to find he's been looking at him in the mirror every day since she died. That scene at the allotment... intriguing. When did Patrick have his stroke? Was it before or after the phone was buried? If Lucy's belongings were buried before Peter took over the allotment I think he can be ruled out of that little strand. The writers continue to tease us with clues. I love it. |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 26 Aug 2014, 22:10 Post #1000 |
|
The idea of him being hellbent on finding the killer before realising it was him is so tragic. I really think Peter, Ian, Denise, Jane, Cindy and Lola is the shortlist now. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |














7:45 PM Jul 11