| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,858 Views) | |
| Forest11 | 6 Dec 2014, 18:54 Post #1461 |
|
I think New Years day will be a big Beale focused episode because according to the radio times James Payne has wrote it. |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 7 Dec 2014, 17:32 Post #1462 |
![]()
|
I'm still edging for Billy as the killer, Lola helping to move the body, with Ben and Jay knowing the truth. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Shaz1022 | 7 Dec 2014, 21:54 Post #1463 |
|
The more Whitney is off the screen the more I think it could be her . I think a lot of people will have forgotten her as a suspect . But then again has Whitney or anyone really been behaving like they have killed someone , not really . Perhaps Ben Mitchell but I don't think he is responsible for Lucy's death . |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 7 Dec 2014, 23:07 Post #1464 |
|
No one really behaved as though they'd killed Archie. Whitney's about to be the latest red herring. Just think who hasn't had a bite of the fish yet. You'll find your killer or killers there. |
![]() |
|
| Forest11 | 7 Dec 2014, 23:11 Post #1465 |
|
I think Whitney is off screen through for reasons unplanned through. It fell like she has had to be written out of scenes quickly. Either Illness, other Personal reasons or Disciplinary reasons. |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 7 Dec 2014, 23:18 Post #1466 |
![]()
|
I know you're intent on your theory of Ronnie and Charlie killing Lucy, however you do realise that would have little impact as neither character had any connection to Lucy? Therefore how can it be "rooted in truth" which is the quote from the writer himself. It's got to be an outcome where the audience say "ah, yes" not "erm what?" |
| |
![]() |
|
| Jade | 8 Dec 2014, 01:46 Post #1467 |
|
What do we believe will happen to the killer? Will they stay around? Flee? Arrested etc? I hope something happens as I don't want EE to turn into a place were lots of killers are walking around after a while it gets silly. But so many going would another one be a good idea? Its something I am very torn about. |
|
Your approval is neither desired nor required. Julia Smith "We decided to go for a realistic, fairly outspoken type of drama which could encompass stories about homosexuality, rape, unemployment, racial prejudice, etc., in a believable context. Above all, we wanted realism". | |
![]() |
|
| Professor Plum | 8 Dec 2014, 01:47 Post #1468 |
|
Dont forget the tragic part. Even though Ronnie is acting "sane" at the moment, I cant help but remember what she was like a while back. there was the scenes in the hospital with Lola, that creepy scene with Roxy in the boxing ring... Ronnie is acting sane again because she is pregnant. (not sure I would want to risk a much wanted high risk pregnancy with a plane flight, but anyway....) Whats the bet she loses the baby and everything comes tumbling out? Soap justice: a life for a life |
| Just livin' in perfect New Zealand! | |
![]() |
|
| MuteBanana | 8 Dec 2014, 03:01 Post #1469 |
|
Good question. The decision to make this a Beale murder makes me think the show is trying to bring the focus back on them for the anniversary. So I think it will be an exit, a permanent exit, for the killer. The fallout has been the stuff that pulls viewers in and as the Beale's are the furniture I'd be surprised if they had to handle living amongst the killer. My own video, sorry, but I love this clip of Hetti's Lucy standing up for herself. Lucy vs Derek |
![]() |
|
| Mr Branning | 8 Dec 2014, 03:12 Post #1470 |
|
Calling it now - Peggy did it. |
| |
![]() |
|
| TimWil | 8 Dec 2014, 03:56 Post #1471 |
|
I'm actually back to thinking it's Les and Pam now. Pam's touchy-feely warmth just seems a bit too much over the top. I'd love it if Peggy saw right through it and unmasked her. |
![]() |
|
| Dan | 9 Dec 2014, 01:09 Post #1472 |
![]() ![]()
|
Ronnie is sane. Disturbingly so. She is simply a psychopath. Did she kill Lucy? Well, it would be a good storyline but I have to say, probably not now as much as I like the theory. Could she have killed Lucy? Without a shadow of a doubt. She is one of the few in the Square who it genuinely would not bother. |
![]() Walford is about to change, lives are about to be destroyed, alliances will begin and the residents will never be the same again. Welcome to "Dungeon". New fan fic, coming soon... Thanks Nick M for the brilliant sig! | |
![]() |
|
| NevermindMe | 9 Dec 2014, 09:32 Post #1473 |
![]()
|
Well we now know Ronnie and Charlie weren't the dealers so that theory is eliminated. Although it already was eliminated when Ronnie told Charlie shed killed someone. |
| |
![]() |
|
| luisgarcia | 9 Dec 2014, 14:16 Post #1474 |
![]()
|
Agreed. I was thinking the same thing not too long ago. Not sure how it's connected, but I reckon it'll be in the mix one way or another. |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 16 Dec 2014, 08:36 Post #1475 |
![]()
|
All the recent spoilers sound thrilling. I think we can now narrow our suspect list down to Ian, Peter, Cindy, Jane, Max, Abi or Lauren. If so then Peter and Abi are my joint top bets, followed by Cindy. I wonder what the eerie gift is. Maybe some cocaine? |
![]() |
|
| Kim | 16 Dec 2014, 10:20 Post #1476 |
|
Max and Lauren are probably unlikely, due to Jacqueline's maternity leave and Jake having his scenes cut down due to Strictly. |
![]() |
|
| Forest11 | 16 Dec 2014, 10:44 Post #1477 |
|
Not certainly as the present could enter the house by someone else. Cindy is my guess and her sending the present to herself is rule her out. Second Abi because she would be sick enough. |
![]() |
|
| Kim | 16 Dec 2014, 11:30 Post #1478 |
|
If it's Beales and Brannings, then potentially Carol, Sonia, Liam and Rebecca are still on the list. |
![]() |
|
| leobeast | 16 Dec 2014, 14:02 Post #1479 |
|
I'm not ruling anyone out. Just because the Beales and the Brannings are there, that doesn't mean it was one of them who put that present under the tree at all. |
![]() |
|
| MrJames | 16 Dec 2014, 17:53 Post #1480 |
|
No, but we do know that the suspect list is going to be narrowed down on New Year's Day and Emma is one first-name basis with the killer. I'm happy for a few Mitchells to be thrown in there, but at the moment it doesn't like anyone but a Beale or a Branning. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |














7:45 PM Jul 11