| Welcome to Walford Web, the online home of EastEnders' discussion since 1997. We cover EastEnders news, discussion and spoilers. Join the discussion and make your voice heard! We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're wondering what EastEnders is, click here to see what all the fuss is about. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Who Killed Lucy?; All the theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 20 Apr 2014, 05:49 (367,836 Views) | |
| Mrs Peel | 3 Jan 2015, 15:17 Post #1901 |
|
Ian may be blocking out what he did, and what he did was probably unintentional and accidental. Ian and Lucy have always had a volatile relationship since her adolescence. Remember this scene with another Lucy:- I think this is turning into a cover-up to protect Ian. At the moment, Jane and Phil know, and Phil's motivation is primarily Ben's involvement, because this could send Ben back to prison. As someone else said, this will tie up the Cotton-Mitchell feud into this storyline, it will put Nick behind bars, ironically, for a murder he didn't commit, and it will give Ian a vehicle by which he can end his Walford tenure when Adam Woodyatt is ready to go. Still makes Walford look a bit ridiculous as a haven for killers, though. |
![]() |
|
| CivvyStreet | 3 Jan 2015, 15:26 Post #1902 |
|
It would be very Twin Peaks. . . Would you buy this as a fan though Mrs Peel? (Even if you think the solution makes sense in terms of the plot, could you accept it as plausible in terms of being a viewer who knows the characters?) |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 15:27 Post #1903 |
|
I agree ians reaction should be central, however who says Ian even has to know what he did? The reveal could be between the people who know discussing fitting up nick for it. Perhaps there is no drama at the wedding, just the sad thought that we know their secrets regarding Lucy. I have to admit, id prefer a drama free wedding!! |
| |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 15:30 Post #1904 |
|
Or maybe Adam has expressed a wish to leave hence getting the achievement award last year. But not around the anniversary meaning nearer next Christmas he could find out what he's done? Sometimes I do think the fact that Ian would be so redicously impossible given ians status in ee and Adam as a long serving cast member makes it so much more likely to happen. Sometimes it's better to hide in plain sight and the most obvious is because it's true. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Slater11 | 3 Jan 2015, 15:31 Post #1905 |
|
It's Freddie Roscoe from Hollyoaks, he constantly has a shocked face:o. |
![]() |
|
| Torrie | 3 Jan 2015, 15:40 Post #1906 |
|
I know it sounds ridiculous to talk of tainting Ian's character when you think of some of the nasty, cruel stuff he's done over the years, but he is such a part of EE's history and there's huge affection for the actor. I know feelings towards the actor wouldn't change, but even if Adam was leaving, I don't know if the writers would want his character 'tainted' in that way. Sometimes he's been a 'love-to-hate' figure, but again, there's a big leap to killing his own daughter. I guess it could be played as very tragic, but again, I find that a bit of step - putting the rest of the family through the whole ordeal of not knowing, especially Peter. Unless he somehow doesn't know - but I find that a reach as well. Surely if there had been a row and a bump to the head or whatever, knowing Lucy had died, you'd panic and wonder if it could have been your fault. Unless he has totally blacked it out. Which would be awfully convenient. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Ross | 3 Jan 2015, 15:42 Post #1907 |
![]()
I'm in the kitchen eating a biscuit
|
No, Jane's car is the blue one outside number 43. There's a big clue to the identity of who killed Lucy in the footage of Lauren outside the Beales house. The mystery can be solved with one question: where is Jane's car?
Edited by Ross, 3 Jan 2015, 15:51.
|
Massive thanks to NickM for this wonderful signature! ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 3 Jan 2015, 15:48 Post #1908 |
![]()
|
Didn't the BBC upload the phone video? I need to see it again? Just noticed something. In Abi's video she mentions Max going to walk the dog, but in Max's video he doesn't. |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 15:48 Post #1909 |
|
It's pretty odd that Ben tells Phil then we hear nothing.more. The man with the neck tattoo mention.could also help frame nick. The thing is, you cant technically see if Janes car is.still in front of ians? And surely if her car was in any common cctv that would immediately point at her? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 15:49 Post #1910 |
|
On page 83 of this thread there's the link to the fatboy video |
| |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 15:50 Post #1911 |
|
Can anyone remember exactly what Janes alibi was? Did she ever mention going out? And did we see her in the pub or anywhere in lucys murder ep? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Ross | 3 Jan 2015, 15:52 Post #1912 |
![]()
I'm in the kitchen eating a biscuit
|
Fair point. But, at the end of the day, the car has moved position from where it was for most of the day, to when Lauren went knocking on the Beale's door (that is if the car is now parked in fromt of Ian's). |
Massive thanks to NickM for this wonderful signature! ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 3 Jan 2015, 15:58 Post #1913 |
|
Not at all, because I don't think this producer has the gumption to sacrifice a major believeable killer, and by that I mean someone of the calibre of Jane or Max, or even to have made someone like Ronnie Mitchell, already a killer, pay legally for what she has done. We several people who have killed, either accidentally (Phil and now Roxy), deliberately (Ronnie, Ben, Stacey) or assisting a suicide (Pam). A woman who kidnaps and keeps a child is allowed to return to that same community. And we have a rapist hanging around for good measure. As good as the show is at the moment, it's low on giving people sufficient karma for killing/harming other people. |
![]() |
|
| Mrs Peel | 3 Jan 2015, 16:01 Post #1914 |
|
Max later corrected that when he told the police about seeing Lucy with Jake Stone. His words were "I only stepped out for five minutes." |
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 16:07 Post #1915 |
|
Denise was in the beale house. Unless she left again after going into the bedroom. If she left, where did she go? Could it be the murder happened in the restaurant? It would help to know where Cindy was too. Theres still a few holes in the idea for sure, but it's all down to the location of the murder and who was where. Edited by Fehnder, 3 Jan 2015, 16:10.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Torrie | 3 Jan 2015, 16:09 Post #1916 |
|
The thing I don't get is why the killer just walks away from Emma, knowing that she has the power to out them. I get that it's one of the residents and not a crazed serial killer who is prepared to off anyone who stands in their way. But it seems a bit odd. "Here's my side of things ..." "It's still murder ..." "Oh, okay, bye then ..." Emma holding off in the hope that the killer will go to the police on their own I get - it will go better for them than if they have to be hauled off. Not much, mind you, given how long they've stayed quiet. But that again makes me think it's someone Emma is that wee bit closer to or has more concern for - a Beale or a Branning. Would she particularly want things to go easier for someone like Lee or Whitney or even Ben, although his connection to Ian may soften her towards him? I also wonder if there's a clue in how much Emma didn't want to meet the person alone? I guess you could just say that's sensible when dealing with anyone who killed someone. But she wanted to meet in the open and didn't want the wee cafe bloke to close up. Given that she is a trained cop, would she be SO nervous about meeting the likes of Lauren, Abi or Whitney? Whereas physically at least, she may have more to worry about with, just for example, Peter or Lee or even Jane. |
| |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 3 Jan 2015, 16:10 Post #1917 |
![]()
|
Well well well. Something is definitely not there.
|
![]() |
|
| Fehnder | 3 Jan 2015, 16:13 Post #1918 |
|
The cars have moved in any case. Ians car is further forward. Also fatboys video has no time. It wasn't pub closing as they all left before Lucy got on the bus. So how much later was that? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Ross | 3 Jan 2015, 16:13 Post #1919 |
![]()
I'm in the kitchen eating a biscuit
|
Case closed. B-) |
Massive thanks to NickM for this wonderful signature! ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| WalfordE20 | 3 Jan 2015, 16:14 Post #1920 |
![]()
|
The restaurant is a good suggestion. It's where she opened her eyes that day- maybe it's where she closed them too. It's plausible for any of the Beales to have been there that night, and would of course fit the 'upsetting' label. I'm really going to miss the speculation once all this is over. In some ways might be a good thing though. Most people don't spend their Saturday trying to work out who killed Lucy Beale. B-) |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · EastEnders Current & Future · Next Topic » |










7:45 PM Jul 11